pandaemonaeum (
pandaemonaeum) wrote2009-01-26 12:35 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Upset
I am sick to death of hearing Sexy Sunday being referred to as 'Slappers R Us'. I DJ there, and am a respectable married woman. I do not like being called a slapper. All of the stuff at Sexy Sunday is like a Carry-on film - silly double entendres, daft jokes and general silliness as an end to what can sometimes be quite a serious weekend.
I would also like to remind everyone that the supposed 'nastiness' coming from Sexy Sunday is mainly rumour and conjecture. I have spoken to the people who run the event and they have no malice or ill-will towards anyone else's events; they just want to be able to run theirs with the minimum of goth scene politics, which no-one currently will let them do! Anyone who knows me well will know that I would not have any part of this type of thing, and will actively combat it where I can. I am an honest person, and wouldn't lie about what was really going on. Nor am I naive; I would recognise if I was being misled.
I am also aware of some facts in this situation that people are not discussing. I will keep these private out of respect for the organisations involved, for the moment.
Yes, there are now effectively 4 goth weekends a year in Whitby. 2 large ones, and 2 small ones. People are free to choose which of these they spend their money on. If the ones Hazel is running are not successful, then she will stop running them. It's as simple as that.
I would also like to remind everyone that I work in one of the most political towns in the UK (Newcastle) and am sick to the back teeth of the politics everyone indulges at every given opportunity. Perhaps if we all stopped bitching at one another, the scene as a whole would be a nicer place to be.
I am very upset about this.
I would also like to remind everyone that the supposed 'nastiness' coming from Sexy Sunday is mainly rumour and conjecture. I have spoken to the people who run the event and they have no malice or ill-will towards anyone else's events; they just want to be able to run theirs with the minimum of goth scene politics, which no-one currently will let them do! Anyone who knows me well will know that I would not have any part of this type of thing, and will actively combat it where I can. I am an honest person, and wouldn't lie about what was really going on. Nor am I naive; I would recognise if I was being misled.
I am also aware of some facts in this situation that people are not discussing. I will keep these private out of respect for the organisations involved, for the moment.
Yes, there are now effectively 4 goth weekends a year in Whitby. 2 large ones, and 2 small ones. People are free to choose which of these they spend their money on. If the ones Hazel is running are not successful, then she will stop running them. It's as simple as that.
I would also like to remind everyone that I work in one of the most political towns in the UK (Newcastle) and am sick to the back teeth of the politics everyone indulges at every given opportunity. Perhaps if we all stopped bitching at one another, the scene as a whole would be a nicer place to be.
I am very upset about this.
:D
Re: :D
I have it from the horses mouth that I have been pushed out - you DJ for her - you are merely in her emply - but if you really don't know what has been going on, then you are definitely out of the loop! But as I say - you are not someone I consider to be an organiser of the event.
If you have issue with this - you should think about how pissed of you get every time someone out-gigs Charnel House!
Re: :D
I know damn well what's going on with Hazel. You can think what you like about me being in or out of the loop. I know that Hazel feels she has something to prove, but it's not to the WDS. There are some thoroughly unpleasant things going on, and we've all gotten caught up in it. I have heard from both sides and I don't want to take sides, I work for Hazel, I work for Jo, I've worked for the WDS. I like working for all parties. But I don't like being called names, and when this particular phrase cropped up on the WGW forum, I objected there and I will continue to object.
No matter who 'out-gigs' Charnel House, we have never given up. If someone puts on a busier night, we increase promotion, look at what we can do to improve, bite the bullet and take the criticism on the chin. Hazel has a lot of drive, and it's just her. She promotes the hell out of her events, looks at the criticism, makes decisions based on it, and is quite pragmatic about the whole thing.
The old WDS used to run events very close to the WGW, and people used to go to both events. You could have continued to run; some people would go to both, some would go to one or the other, and some people wouldn't go to either one. The WDS ball is clearly aimed at a very different market to Hazel's events - there are a lot of people who would rather go to a Ball than a gig or a party. There is a very successful Ball (Georgian?) run in Oxford, as well as others up and down the country. Hazel is targetting a very different audience. There is deliberately no vampire theming, and there's nothing that could even remotely be tagged a 'Ball'. I have never seen any of the sort of people you attracted to the Ball at Hazel's events, except a few people who live relatively locally and would go to whatever was on. The key is promoting to the right crowd, hence the way Hazel promotes her stuff. And it's just that - it's a persona. Like Ghost's ego, it's 9/10ths an act.
Re: :D
Hazel should maybe try to put on and event in Wakefield, I promise, I wouldn't haul into town and put one on against her!
No? Not likely?
You know exactly why she put an event on up agaionst both of ours, and hey - it worked.
So what!
Re: :D
I have plenty of things to do with my time, but we (finally) have a tight team, who all do a little bit towards the promotion and running of the night.
You can have any issues you like with Hazel, I just don't want to be involved. I have never heard Hazel say anything about you, or the WDS, beyond telling me that she enjoyed the event(s?) she attended. If she had said anything negative, I would have been just as strenuous in my defence of WDS, and of you.